<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: fedora core 5, and the effects of patent compliance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.complich8.net/archives/236/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.complich8.net/archives/236</link>
	<description>complacence is the enemy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 13:22:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: seanos</title>
		<link>http://www.complich8.net/archives/236/comment-page-1#comment-702</link>
		<dc:creator>seanos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 23:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/archives/236#comment-702</guid>
		<description>Depends what your looking for really - may not also hurt to take a look at CentOS (RHEL rebuild).
Don&#039;t get newest packages in it, or anything close, but stability does make a nice change after a couple years on FC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Depends what your looking for really &#8211; may not also hurt to take a look at CentOS (RHEL rebuild).<br />
Don&#8217;t get newest packages in it, or anything close, but stability does make a nice change after a couple years on FC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: complich8</title>
		<link>http://www.complich8.net/archives/236/comment-page-1#comment-699</link>
		<dc:creator>complich8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 22:06:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/archives/236#comment-699</guid>
		<description>Good to know about ...

I&#039;ve somewhat abandoned the FC side-project for the time being, pretty much for that reason and the lack of time to mess with it... but if I end up going back to it at some point (which is likely) I&#039;ll keep that in mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to know about &#8230;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve somewhat abandoned the FC side-project for the time being, pretty much for that reason and the lack of time to mess with it&#8230; but if I end up going back to it at some point (which is likely) I&#8217;ll keep that in mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seanos</title>
		<link>http://www.complich8.net/archives/236/comment-page-1#comment-698</link>
		<dc:creator>seanos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jun 2006 21:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/archives/236#comment-698</guid>
		<description>Slightly out of date I know, but may be worth your while looking at the rpmforge repo for FC/RHEL.
It won&#039;t handle nVidia, or Java, as for mp3/flash/xvid components, it has most of them (mplayer/vlc/xmms-*).

Of course there are plenty of 3rd party repos, however rpmforge is one of the safer ones (i.e. good packages, and rpmforge&#039;s policy is not to replace core packages) - which is why I would class it under &#039;distribution-friendly&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Slightly out of date I know, but may be worth your while looking at the rpmforge repo for FC/RHEL.<br />
It won&#8217;t handle nVidia, or Java, as for mp3/flash/xvid components, it has most of them (mplayer/vlc/xmms-*).</p>
<p>Of course there are plenty of 3rd party repos, however rpmforge is one of the safer ones (i.e. good packages, and rpmforge&#8217;s policy is not to replace core packages) &#8211; which is why I would class it under &#8216;distribution-friendly&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

